William White <bwhite@frognet.net> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> I can't think of an equally succinct definition of what the operators >> really do though. Comments? > I think "not to the left of" and "not to the right of" are sufficiently > succinct. That they may not see much user application may not be > relevant, if they are required to properly implement << and >> on rtrees. Right, but what about the existing operators --- what is a more correct way to document them? regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
