Re: Bulk DML performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: Bulk DML performance
From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 12:29:23 +0100
In-reply-to: <d58bb88b06a40233aef8e07a39fd234458abc009.camel@cybertec.at>
References: <008701db93cd$2eb404d0$8c1c0e70$.ref@ymail.com> <008701db93cd$2eb404d0$8c1c0e70$@ymail.com> <0942a47d7a89f1b181f7e306f8389d9717eb5fe0.camel@cybertec.at> <00a401db9400$86c240f0$9446c2d0$@ymail.com> <d58bb88b06a40233aef8e07a39fd234458abc009.camel@cybertec.at>
User-agent: Evolution 3.54.3 (3.54.3-1.fc41)

On Thu, 2025-03-13 at 12:28 +0100, I wrote:
> Then the best you can do is to use COPY rather than INSERT.
> It will perform better (but now vastly better).

Sorry, I meant "*not* vastly better".

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

References:
- Bulk DML performance
  - From: bill.poole
- Re: Bulk DML performance
  - From: Laurenz Albe
- Re: Bulk DML performance
  - From: Laurenz Albe

Prev by Date: Re: Bulk DML performance
Next by Date: Re: Bulk DML performance
Previous by thread: Re: Bulk DML performance
Next by thread: Re: Bulk DML performance
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Postgresql General] [Postgresql PHP] [PHP Users] [PHP Home] [PHP on Windows] [Kernel Newbies] [PHP Classes] [PHP Books] [PHP Databases] [Yosemite]

Powered by Linux