Re: I don't understand that EXPLAIN PLAN timings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

In case it might be useful, I made some more tests.

On my dev computer (a notebook) I installed:

PostgreSQL 15.5 (Ubuntu 15.5-1.pgdg23.10+1) on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (Ubuntu 13.2.0-4ubuntu3) 13.2.0, 64-bit

and

PostgreSQL 16.1 (Ubuntu 16.1-1.pgdg23.10+1) on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (Ubuntu 13.2.0-4ubuntu3) 13.2.0, 64-bit

I adjusted work_mem to 1GB and disabled JIT, restored the same DB, did VACUUM ANALYZE and ran the query several times to lower I/O interference.

Execution time is about the same on PG 14, 15 and 16, around ~120ms

I noticed that planning time, whatever the version, is very variable between executions (ranging from 0.120ms to 0.400ms), probably due to other programs activity and <1ms measurements imprecision. So the results I gave you in my previous email are probably irrelevant.


On our production server, which is running PG 14.10 on Debian 11, same work_mem, execution time is ~45ms but planning time is much more consistent at ~0.110ms

Interestingly though, lowering work_mem to 32MB gives 22ms execution time but planning time rises consistently at ~0.7ms

On my notebook with work_mem=32MB, execution time is also 22ms but planning time is lower at ~0.4ms (?!?)


Let me know if I can do anything to provide you with more useful benchmark. The DB is still very small so it is easy to do tests.

JC







[Postgresql General]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP Users]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux