Ok I'll do that, thanks a lot!
On Wed, 30 Nov 2022 at 18:45, Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Igor ALBUQUERQUE SILVA <i.albuquerque-silva@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Thanks a lot for the explanation, I thought the built-in types were more
> standard, so I didn't mention that I was having the same thing using
> postgis.
Hm --- you'd have to take that up with the PostGIS people. But they
at least would be likely to have motivation to improve things.
regards, tom lane
