Re: EXPLAIN PLAN for DELETE CASCADE or DELETE not using pkey index despite EXPLAINing that it would?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 3/21/2019 17:16, Tom Lane wrote:
Gunther <raj@xxxxxxxx> writes:
I have 250 rows to delete, but they are a target to a bunch of child
tables with foreign key on delete cascade.
EXPLAIN DELETE FROM Foo WHERE id = (SELECT fooId FROM Garbage);
shows me that it uses the nested loop by Foo_pkey index to find the 250
items from Garbage to be deleted.
But once that starts, I see HUGE amount of read activity from the
tablespace Foo_main that contains the Foo table, and only the Foo table,
not the Foo_pkey, not any other index, not any other child table, not
even the toast table for Foo is contained in that tablespace (I have the
toast table diverted with symlinks to another volume).
I'm betting you neglected to index the referencing column for one
or more of the foreign keys involved.  You can get away with that
as long as you're not concerned with the speed of DELETE ...

			regards, tom lane

I had the same suspicion. But firstly my schema is generated automatically and all foreign keys have the indexes.

But what is even more stunning is that the table where this massive read activity happens is the Foo heap table. I verified that by using strace where all the massive amounts of reads are on those files for the main Foo table. And this doesn't make sense, since any foreign key targets its primary key. The foreign keys of the child tables are also indexed and there is no io on the volumes that hold these child tables, nor is the io on the volume that holds the Foo_pkey.






[Postgresql General]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP Users]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux