Re: Zero throughput on a query on a very large table.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Correct, but in the Java code, it's multiple statements in a single transaction, so it should stick. Not sure if something else stupid is going on.


Good to know about the ALTER DATABASE effect. I didn't realize that.


Thanks a billion.


Laurent.


From: Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2019 3:04:37 PM
To: ldh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Zero throughput on a query on a very large table.
 
"ldh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <ldh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Second, here is what i found and what messed us up.

>     select current_setting('random_page_cost'); --> 4
>     alter database "CMS_TMP" set random_page_cost=0.00000001;
>     select current_setting('random_page_cost'); --> 4 ????

ALTER DATABASE only affects subsequently-started sessions.

> I also tried:
>     select current_setting('random_page_cost'); --> 4
>     select set_config('random_page_cost', '0.000001', true);
>     select current_setting('random_page_cost'); --> 4 ????

That "true" means "local to the current transaction", which is
just the one statement if you don't have a BEGIN.

                        regards, tom lane

[Postgresql General]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP Users]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux