Greetings, * Merlin Moncure (mmoncure@xxxxxxxxx) wrote: > On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 11:28 AM Stephen Frost <sfrost@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Oh yes, having a dictionary would be a great start to reducing the size > > of the jsonb data, though it could then become a contention point if > > there's a lot of new values being inserted and such. Naturally there > > would also be a cost to pulling that data back out as well but likely it > > would be well worth the benefit of not having to store the field names > > repeatedly. > > Yes, the biggest concern with a shared dictionary ought to be > concurrency type problems. Hmmm, I wonder if we could do something like have a dictionary per page.. Or perhaps based on some hash of the toast ID.. Not sure. :) Thanks! Stephen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
