Re: To keep indexes in memory, is large enough effective_cache_size enough?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: To keep indexes in memory, is large enough effective_cache_size enough?
From: Kaixi Luo <kaixiluo@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 12:12:35 +0200
Cc: samruohola@xxxxxxxxx, sk@xxxxxxxx, pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CAKJS1f_rMSNu2atjj09f6i-GGOavqxKy8F_J5pO2qHDa8+4Mgw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1321418371.5650982.1537346138600.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1321418371.5650982.1537346138600@mail.yahoo.com> <5456011537348252@sas1-fed4e4c8a570.qloud-c.yandex.net> <1476619436.6435500.1537348704720@mail.yahoo.com> <CAKJS1f_rMSNu2atjj09f6i-GGOavqxKy8F_J5pO2qHDa8+4Mgw@mail.gmail.com>

Does a large shared_buffers impact checkpoint performance negatively? I was under the impression that everything inside shared_buffers must be written during a checkpoint.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: To keep indexes in memory, is large enough effective_cache_size enough?
  - From: David Rowley

References:
- To keep indexes in memory, is large enough effective_cache_size enough?
  - From: Sam R.
- Re: To keep indexes in memory, is large enough effective_cache_size enough?
  - From: Sergei Kornilov
- Re: To keep indexes in memory, is large enough effective_cache_size enough?
  - From: Sam R.
- Re: To keep indexes in memory, is large enough effective_cache_size enough?
  - From: David Rowley

Prev by Date: Re: To keep indexes in memory, is large enough effective_cache_size enough?
Next by Date: Re: To keep indexes in memory, is large enough effective_cache_size enough?
Previous by thread: Re: To keep indexes in memory, is large enough effective_cache_size enough?
Next by thread: Re: To keep indexes in memory, is large enough effective_cache_size enough?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Postgresql General] [Postgresql PHP] [PHP Users] [PHP Home] [PHP on Windows] [Kernel Newbies] [PHP Classes] [PHP Books] [PHP Databases] [Yosemite]