Hello Hellmuth,
Thank you for your response.
I've uploaded the query plan for the first query (user_id=2) here: https://gist.github.com/anonymous/6d251b277ef71f8977b03cab91fedccd
The query plan for the second query (user_id=1) can be found here: https://gist.github.com/anonymous/32ed485b40cce2651ddc52661f3e7f7b
Just like in the original queries, posts_user_id_id_index is not used.
Kind regards,
Milo
13. Feb 2018 22:13 by hivs77@xxxxxxxxx:
Hello:EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS)select * from (FROM posts JOIN users ON posts.user_id = users.idWHERE posts.user_id IN (SELECT friend_user_id FROM friends WHERE user_id = 1)ORDER BY posts.id DESC) as aORDER BY a.id DESCLIMIT 10;------2018-02-13 8:28 GMT-05:00 <mkslaf@xxxxxxxxxx>:Hello,I have the following schema:CREATE TABLE users (id BIGSERIAL PRIMARY KEY,name TEXT NOT NULL UNIQUE);CREATE TABLE friends (user_id BIGINT NOT NULL REFERENCES users,friend_user_id BIGINT NOT NULL REFERENCES users,UNIQUE (user_id, friend_user_id));CREATE TABLE posts (id BIGSERIAL PRIMARY KEY,user_id BIGINT NOT NULL REFERENCES users,content TEXT NOT NULL);CREATE INDEX posts_user_id_id_index ON posts(user_id, id);Each user can unilaterally follow any number of friends. The posts table has a large number of rows and is rapidly growing.My goal is to retrieve the 10 most recent posts of a user's friends. This query gives the correct result, but is inefficient:SELECT posts.id, users.name, posts.contentFROM posts JOIN users ON posts.user_id = users.idWHERE posts.user_id IN (SELECT friend_user_id FROM friends WHERE user_id = 1)ORDER BY posts.id DESC LIMIT 10;If the user's friends have recently posted, the query is still reasonably fast (https://explain.depesz.com/s/6ykR). But if the user's friends haven't recently posted or the user has no friends, it quickly deteriorates (https://explain.depesz.com/s/OnoG).If I match only a single post author (e.g. WHERE posts.user_id = 5), Postgres uses the index posts_user_id_id_index. But if I use IN, the index doesn't appear to be used at all.How can I get these results more efficiently?I've uploaded the schema and the queries I've tried to dbfiddle at http://dbfiddle.uk/?rdbms=postgres_9.6&fiddle=cf1489b7f6d53c3fe0b55ed7ccbad1f0. The output of "SELECT version()" is "PostgreSQL 9.6.5 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (Debian 4.9.2-10) 4.9.2, 64-bit" for me.Thank you in advance for any insights, pointers or suggestions you are able to give me.Regards,Milo--Cordialmente,
Ing. Hellmuth I. Vargas S.
Esp. Telemática y Negocios por InternetOracle Database 10g Administrator Certified AssociateEnterpriseDB Certified PostgreSQL 9.3 Associate