On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 12:44:00PM -0800, Neto pr wrote: > Dear all > > Someone help me analyze the two execution plans below (Explain ANALYZE > used), is the query 9 of TPC-H benchmark [1]. > > I'm using a server HP Intel Xeon 2.8GHz/4-core - Memory 8GB HDD SAS 320GB > 15 Krpm AND SSD Sansung EVO 500GB. > > I think maybe the execution plan is using more write operations, and so the > HDD SAS 15Krpm has been faster. The query plan is all garbled by mail , could you resend? Or post a link from https://explain.depesz.com/ To see if the query is causing many writes (due to dirty pages, sorts, etc), run with explain(analyze,buffers) But from what I could tell, your problems are here: -> Parallel Seq Scan on lineitem (cost=0.00..5861332.93 rows=100005093 width=41) (actual TIME=3.494..842667.110 rows=80004097 loops=3) vs -> Parallel Seq Scan on lineitem (cost=0.00..5861333.40 rows=100005140 width=41) (actual TIME=41.805..224438.909 rows=80004097 loops=3) -> Seq Scan on partsupp (cost=0.00..1052983.08 rows=31999708 width=22) (actual TIME=0.033..228828.149 rows=32000000 loops=3) vs -> Seq Scan on partsupp (cost=0.00..1052934.38 rows=31994838 width=22) (actual TIME=0.037..37865.003 rows=32000000 loops=3) Can you reproduce the speed difference using dd ? time sudo dd if=/dev/sdX of=/dev/null bs=1M count=32K skip=$((128*$RANDOM/32)) # set bs to optimal_io_size Or: bonnie++ -f -n0 What OS/kernel are you using? LVM? filesystem? I/O scheduler? partitions? readahead? blockdev --getra If you're running under linux, maybe you can just send the output of: for a in /sys/block/sdX/queue/*; do echo "$a `cat $a`"; done or: tail /sys/block/sdX/queue/{minimum_io_size,optimal_io_size,read_ahead_kb,scheduler,rotational,max_sectors_kb,logical_block_size,physical_block_size} Justin
