Yeah, thanks. We have it in count.
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 9:45 PM, Moreno Andreo <moreno.andreo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Il 06/09/2017 10:12, Soni M ha scritto:
May not be relevant to what you asked, but if you want to keep last yeat data in a "small and fast" dataset separated (physically separated!) by old data (that's still available, but response times may vary), IMHO you should consider partitioning...
Let's say I have 10 year data, and commonly used data only the last 1 year. This data is quite big, so each table and index file is divided into several file in PGDATA/base
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/ddl-partition ing.html
HTH,
Moreno.-
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org )
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
Regards,
