Re: Improving PostgreSQL insert performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 02:39:37PM +0000, Frits Jalvingh wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Thanks a lot for the many responses!
> 
> About preparing statements: this is done properly in Java, and pgsql does
> it by itself. So that cannot be done better ;)
> 
> I tried the copy command, and that indeed works quite brilliantly:
> Inserted 24000000 rows in 22004 milliseconds, 1090710.7798582076 rows per
> second
> 
> That's faster than Oracle. But with a very bad interface I have to say for
> normal database work.. I will try to make this work in the tooling, but it
> needs some very special code to format all possible values properly, and to
> manage the end of the copy, so it is not usable in general which is a pity,
> I think.
> 
> So, I am still very interested in getting normal inserts faster, because
> that will gain speed for all work.. If Oracle can do it, and Postgres is
> able to insert fast with copy- where lies the bottleneck with the insert
> command? There seems to be quite a performance hit with the JDBC driver
> itself (as the stored procedure is a lot faster), so I can look into that.
> But even after that there is quite a gap..
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Frits

Hi Frits,

Have you looked at UNLOGGED tables and also having more that 1 insert
stream running at a time. Sometimes multiple parallel inserts can be
faster.

Regards,
Ken


-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance



[Postgresql General]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP Users]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux