This could look strange, but is fast as hell!
The main problem is:
Is everytime ok doing query like this with order by and limit? Is ok using an upperlimit to 1.000.000.000 records?
SELECT * FROM (
SELECT fase.id
FROM tipofase
JOIN fase
ON (fase.tipofase = tipofase.id)
WHERE agendafrontoffice = true
ORDER BY fase.id DESC limit 1000000000 offset 0
) A
ORDER BY A.id DESC limit 10 offset 0
2017-04-20 18:05 GMT+02:00 Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@xxxxxxxxx>:
I am afraid so is not possible to solve this issue by one query. In this case the planner expects early stop due finding few values. But because there are not any value, the LIMIT clause has not any benefit in executor time, but the planner is messed. Maybe try to increase LIMIT to some higher value .. 1000, 10000 so planner don't fall to this trap. PostgreSQL statistics are about most common values, but the values without any occurrence are not well registered by statistics.RegardsIt can looks strange, but it can workSELECT *FROM (your query ORDER BY .. OFFSET 0 LIMIT 10000) sORDER BY ...LIMIT 10;RegardsPavel