Re: less than 2 sec for response - possible?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi, yes I've tried it in the past, it makes no any difference at all:

With TIMESTAMP cast:

QUERY PLAN
HashAggregate (cost=1405666.90..1416585.93 rows=335970 width=86) (actual time=4794.585..4923.062 rows=126533 loops=1)
"  Group Key: subid, sid"
  Buffers: shared hit=1486949
-> Index Scan using ix_feed_sub_aid_date on feed_sub (cost=0.44..1313275.32 rows=3359694 width=86) (actual time=0.020..1736.005 rows=3588376 loops=1) Index Cond: ((aid = 3) AND (date >= '2016-06-01 00:00:00'::timestamp without time zone) AND (date <= '2016-06-30 00:00:00'::timestamp without time zone))
        Buffers: shared hit=1486949
Planning time: 0.158 ms
Execution time: 4939.965 ms


Without TIMESTAMP cast:

QUERY PLAN
HashAggregate (cost=1405666.90..1416585.93 rows=335970 width=86) (actual time=4797.272..4924.015 rows=126533 loops=1)
"  Group Key: subid, sid"
  Buffers: shared hit=1486949
-> Index Scan using ix_feed_sub_aid_date on feed_sub (cost=0.44..1313275.32 rows=3359694 width=86) (actual time=0.019..1783.104 rows=3588376 loops=1) Index Cond: ((aid = 3) AND (date >= '2016-06-01'::date) AND (date <= '2016-06-30'::date))
        Buffers: shared hit=1486949
Planning time: 0.164 ms
Execution time: 4941.259 ms

I need to be sure it's a physical limitation of a Postgresql (when all data is in a memory and fetching\joining 1.5 mln of rows can't be done in less than 2-3 seconds) and there is no way to improve it.



On 07/05/16 04:39, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote:


On 02.07.2016 02:54, trafdev wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'm trying to build an OLAP-oriented DB based on PostgresSQL.
>
> User works with a paginated report in the web-browser. Interface allows
> to fetch data for a custom date-range selection,
> display individual rows (20-50 per page) and totals (for entire
> selection, even not visible on the current page) and sorting by any
> column.
>
> The main goal is to deliver results of the basic SELECT queries to the
> end-user in less than 2 seconds.
>
> I was able to achieve that except for one table (the biggest one).
>
> It consist of multiple dimensions (date, gran, aid, pid, sid, fid,
> subid) and metrics (see below).
> User can filter by any dimension and sort by any metric.
>
> Here is a CREATE script for this table:
>
> CREATE TABLE stats.feed_sub
> (
>   date date NOT NULL,
>   gran interval NOT NULL,
>   aid smallint NOT NULL,
>   pid smallint NOT NULL,
>   sid smallint NOT NULL,
>   fid smallint NOT NULL,
>   subid text NOT NULL,
>   rev_est_pub real NOT NULL,
>   rev_est_feed real NOT NULL,
>   rev_raw real NOT NULL,
>   c_total bigint NOT NULL,
>   c_passed bigint NOT NULL,
>   q_total bigint NOT NULL,
>   q_passed bigint NOT NULL,
>   q_filt_geo bigint NOT NULL,
>   q_filt_browser bigint NOT NULL,
>   q_filt_os bigint NOT NULL,
>   q_filt_ip bigint NOT NULL,
>   q_filt_subid bigint NOT NULL,
>   q_filt_pause bigint NOT NULL,
>   q_filt_click_cap_ip bigint NOT NULL,
>   q_filt_query_cap bigint NOT NULL,
>   q_filt_click_cap bigint NOT NULL,
>   q_filt_rev_cap bigint NOT NULL,
>   q_filt_erpm_floor bigint NOT NULL,
>   c_filt_click_cap_ip bigint NOT NULL,
>   c_filt_doubleclick bigint NOT NULL,
>   c_filt_url_expired bigint NOT NULL,
>   c_filt_fast_click bigint NOT NULL,
>   c_filt_delay_clicks bigint NOT NULL,
>   c_filt_ip_mismatch bigint NOT NULL,
>   c_filt_ref_mismatch bigint NOT NULL,
>   c_filt_lng_mismatch bigint NOT NULL,
>   c_filt_ua_mismatch bigint NOT NULL,
>   res_impr bigint NOT NULL,
>   rev_ver_pub real,
>   rev_ver_feed real,
>   c_ver bigint,
>   q_filt_ref bigint NOT NULL
> )
> WITH (
>   OIDS=FALSE
> );
>
> CREATE INDEX ix_feed_sub_date
>   ON stats.feed_sub
>   USING brin
>   (date);
>
> CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ixu_feed_sub
>   ON stats.feed_sub
>   USING btree
>   (date, gran, aid, pid, sid, fid, subid COLLATE pg_catalog."default");
>
> Here is some sizing info (https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Disk_Usage):
>
> relation,size
> stats.feed_sub,5644 MB
> stats.ixu_feed_sub,1594 MB
>
> row_estimate
> 15865627
>
> Here is the typical query (for totals beige):
> SELECT
>   sum(stats.feed_sub.c_filt_click_cap_ip) AS clicks_from_ip,
>   sum(stats.feed_sub.c_filt_doubleclick)  AS clicks_on_target,
>   sum(stats.feed_sub.c_filt_delay_clicks) AS ip_click_period,
>   sum(stats.feed_sub.c_filt_fast_click)   AS fast_click,
>   sum(stats.feed_sub.c_filt_ip_mismatch)  AS ip_mismatch,
>   sum(stats.feed_sub.c_filt_lng_mismatch) AS lng_mismatch,
>   sum(stats.feed_sub.c_filt_ref_mismatch) AS ref_mismatch,
>   sum(stats.feed_sub.c_filt_ua_mismatch)  AS ua_mismatch,
>   sum(stats.feed_sub.c_filt_url_expired)  AS url_expired,
>   stats.feed_sub.subid                    AS stats_feed_sub_subid,
>   stats.feed_sub.sid                      AS stats_feed_sub_sid
> FROM stats.feed_sub
> WHERE stats.feed_sub.date >= '2016-06-01' :: TIMESTAMP AND
>       stats.feed_sub.date <= '2016-06-30' :: TIMESTAMP AND
>       stats.feed_sub.gran = '1 day'
>       AND stats.feed_sub.aid = 3
> GROUP BY
>   stats.feed_sub.subid, stats.feed_sub.sid;

You cast every date to an timestamp. Why? You can adjust the index to:

CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ixu_feed_sub
ON stats.feed_sub
USING btree
(date::timestamp, gran, aid, pid, sid, fid, subid COLLATE
pg_catalog."default");

But since i see no need for the cast at all (maybe i missed it) try it
without!

Greetings,
Torsten




--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance



[Postgresql General]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP Users]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux