On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 9:19 AM, t.dalpozzo@xxxxxxxxx
<t.dalpozzo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
> I've postgres 9.5.3 installed on win7 64 bit, and ubuntu 16.04tls 64 bit,
> same SSD (evo 850 pro) , two different partitions. Laptop is 3.8Ghz.
> I've in each partition a simple database with one table called data256 with
> one column of 256 char.
> I wrote a program using libpq which:
> 1 connects to 127.0.0.1 to the server
> 2 drops and recreates the table;
> 3 executes 2000 times the exec() function with the command "INSERT INTO
> data256 VALUES ('AAAAAA...... 250 times')"
> I want to commit after every insert of course.
> The program is the same both in win and linux; in ansi c, so it's portable.
>
> Performance:
> Win7: 8000 write/sec
> Linux: 419 write/sec
>
> I don't figure out why such a difference. Also what should I expect? Which
> one is reasonable?
The Win7 numbers seem suspiciously high to me, even for SSD. Have you
tried holding the power button until it hard-resets the computer in
the middle of a run (preferably several runs going in parallel), and
see if comes back up without corruption and contains consistent data?
And then repeat that a several times?
> I compared the two postgresql.conf, they're identical (except obvious
> things), they're the default ones, I didn't touch them.
We don't know which things are obvious to you.
>
> Then, in order to test write / flush without postgres, I made another C
> program, to open a file in writing, and for 1000 times : write 256 bytes and
> flush them (using fsync in linux and FlushFileBuffers in win).
> Win7: 200 write/sec
> Linux: 100 write/sec
Rather than rolling your own program, can you run pg_test_fsync on each?
Cheers,
Jeff
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
