Hi,
I have a table for addresses:
CREATE TABLE adressen.adresse
(
pool_pk integer NOT NULL,
adressnr_pk integer NOT NULL,
anrede varchar(8),
vorname varchar(50) DEFAULT ''::character varying NOT NULL,
name1 varchar(100) NOT NULL,
name2 varchar(80) DEFAULT ''::character varying NOT NULL,
name3 varchar(80) DEFAULT ''::character varying NOT NULL,
strasse varchar(80) DEFAULT ''::character varying NOT NULL,
plz varchar(8) DEFAULT ''::character varying NOT NULL,
ort varchar(80) DEFAULT ''::character varying NOT NULL,
changed timestamptz,
id2 integer
);
The primary key is on 'pool_pk' and 'adressnr_pk' and amongst some other
indexes there is an index
CREATE INDEX trgm_adresse ON adressen.adresse USING gist
(normalize_string((btrim((((((((normalize_string((((COALESCE((vorname)::text,
''::text) || ' '::text) || (name1)::text))::character varying,
(-1)))::text || ' '::text) ||
(normalize_string((COALESCE((strasse)::text, ''::text))::character
varying, (-2)))::text) || ' '::text) || (plz)::text) || ' '::text) ||
(normalize_string((COALESCE((ort)::text, ''::text))::character varying,
(-3)))::text)))::character varying) gist_trgm_ops);
When I try to retrieve some addresses similar to a new address, I use
the following query
SELECT pool_pk AS pool, adressnr_pk AS adrnr, vorname, name1,
strasse, plz, ort, ratio_ld_adresse($1, $2, $3, $4, name1,
strasse, plz, ort)::double precision AS ratio
FROM adressen.adresse
WHERE normalize_string(trim(normalize_string(coalesce(vorname::text, '')
|| ' ' || name1::text, -1) || ' ' ||
normalize_string(coalesce(strasse::text, ''), -2) || ' ' ||
plz::text ||
' ' || normalize_string(coalesce(ort::text, ''), -3))) %
normalize_string(trim(normalize_string($1::text) || ' ' ||
normalize_string(coalesce($2::text, ''), -2) || ' ' || $3::text ||
' ' || normalize_string(coalesce($4::text, ''), -3)))
ORDER BY 1, 8 DESC, 2;
which means: take the normalized (lower case, no accents ...) parts of
the address, concatinate them to
<name> <street> <zip> <city>
and search for a similar address in the existing addresses. The
described index 'trgm_adresse' is built on the same expression.
The function 'normalize_string' is written in plpythonu and doesn't use
any database calls. The same with the function 'ratio_ld_adresse', which
calculates the levenshtein distance for two entire addresses.
Most the time everything works fine and one search (in about 500,000
addresses) lasts about 2 to 5 seconds. But sometimes the search takes 50
or even 300 seconds.
We have two machines which have the same software installation (Ubuntu
14.10 server, Postgres 9.4.4) the production server has 4 GB memory and
2 processors and the test server 2 GB memory and 1 processor. Both are
virtual machines on two different ESX-servers.
On both machines postgres was installed out of the box (apt-get ...)
without configuration modifications (except network interfaces in
pg_hba.conf). The test machine is a little bit slower but the very slow
searches occur much more (~ 35 %) than on the production machine (~10 %).
An explain tells
QUERY PLAN
Sort (cost=2227.31..2228.53 rows=489 width=65)
Sort Key: pool_pk, ((ratio_ld_adresse('Test 2'::character varying,
'Am Hang 12'::character varying, '12345'::character varying,
'Irgendwo'::character varying, name1, strasse, plz, ort))::double
precision), adressnr_pk
-> Index Scan using trgm_adresse on adresse (cost=1.43..2205.46
rows=489 width=65)
Index Cond:
((normalize_string((btrim((((((((normalize_string((((COALESCE((vorname)::text,
''::text) || ' '::text) || (name1)::text))::character varying,
(-1)))::text || ' '::text) ||
(normalize_string((COALESCE((strasse)::text, ''::text))::character
varying, (-2)))::text) || ' '::text) || (plz)::text) || ' '::text) ||
(normalize_string((COALESCE((ort)::text, ''::text))::character varying,
(-3)))::text)))::character varying, 0))::text % 'test 2 am hang 12 12345
irgendwo'::text)
which shows that the index is used and the result should arrive within
some seconds (2228 is not very expensive).
When such a slow query is running, 'top' shows nearly '100 % wait' and
'iotop' shows 3 - 8 MB/sec disk read by a process
postgres: vb vb 10.128.96.25(60435) FETCH
Also the postgres log, which was told to log every task longer than 5000
ms, shows
2015-09-02 13:44:48 CEST [25237-1] vb@vb LOG: duration: 55817.191
ms execute <unnamed>: FETCH FORWARD 4096 IN "py:0xa2d61f6c"
Since I never used a FETCH command in my life, this must be used by
pg_trgm or something inside it (gin, gist etc.)
If during a slow Query one (or several) more instance(s) of the same
query are started, all of them hang and return at the _same second_ some
minutes later. Even if the other queries are on different addresses.
2015-08-31 09:09:00 GMT LOG: duration: 98630.958 ms execute <unnamed>:
FETCH FORWARD 4096 IN "py:0x7fb780a07e10"
2015-08-31 09:09:00 GMT LOG: duration: 266887.136 ms execute
<unnamed>: FETCH FORWARD 4096 IN "py:0x7fb780a95dd8"
2015-08-31 09:09:00 GMT LOG: duration: 170311.627 ms execute
<unnamed>: FETCH FORWARD 4096 IN "py:0x7fb780a77e10"
2015-08-31 09:09:00 GMT LOG: duration: 72614.474 ms execute <unnamed>:
FETCH FORWARD 4096 IN "py:0x7fb780a0ce10"
2015-08-31 09:09:00 GMT LOG: duration: 78561.131 ms execute <unnamed>:
FETCH FORWARD 4096 IN "py:0x7fb780a08da0"
2015-08-31 09:09:00 GMT LOG: duration: 182392.792 ms execute
<unnamed>: FETCH FORWARD 4096 IN "py:0x7fb78170c2b0"
2015-08-31 09:09:00 GMT LOG: duration: 245632.530 ms execute
<unnamed>: FETCH FORWARD 4096 IN "py:0x7fb7809ddc50"
2015-08-31 09:09:00 GMT LOG: duration: 84760.400 ms execute <unnamed>:
FETCH FORWARD 4096 IN "py:0x7fb7809f7dd8"
2015-08-31 09:09:00 GMT LOG: duration: 176402.352 ms execute
<unnamed>: FETCH FORWARD 4096 IN "py:0x7fb7809fc668"
Does anyone have an idea, how to solve this problem?
regards Volker
--
Volker Böhm Tel.: +49 4141 981155 www.vboehm.de
Voßkuhl 5 Fax: +49 4141 981154
21682 Stade mailto:volker@xxxxxxxxx
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
