On 2015-07-08 11:13:04 +0000, Graeme B. Bell wrote: > I'm guessing you are maybe pressed for time at the moment because I > already clearly included this on the last email, as well as the links > to the alternative benchmarks with the same problem I referred to on > both of my last emails which are also trivial to drop into pgbench > (cut/paste). You realize that you want something here, not Merlin, right? > e.g. did you see these parts of my previous email > > "To clear up the issue I build a little test harness around your comment below." > "http://github.com/gbb/ppppt"; Well, that requires reviewing the source code of the run script and such. I think we shouldn't discuss this on two threads (-performance, -bugs), that makes it hard to follow. Given Tom's more detailed answer I think the -bugs thread already contains more pertinent information. -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
