Hi On 06/01/15 22:51, Marco Di Cesare wrote:
I am connecting to a Postgres instance using SSL and seeing fairly slow connect times. I would expect there would be some overhead but it's more than I anticipated. The connection is happening over a network. I am using a wildcard SSL certificate on the server side only. Using one of these JDBC SSL connect strings takes on average: 1060 ms to connect to the database: jdbc:postgresql://db01-dev.pointclickcare.com:5432/testdb?ssl=true&sslmode=require&sslfactory=org.postgresql.ssl.jdbc4.LibPQFactory - or - jdbc:postgresql://db01-dev.pointclickcare.com:5432/testdb?ssl=true&sslmode=require&sslfactory=org.postgresql.ssl.NonValidatingFactory Using this JDBC non-SSL connect string takes on average: 190 ms to connect to the database: jdbc:postgresql://db01-dev.pointclickcare.com:5432/testdb Does this sound like a reasonable overhead that SSL would add to the connection time or does this seem high? (~870ms/~443% slower using SSL)
What is the network latency (ping) between the two hosts? SSL requires a handshake, exchanging a number messages between the two hosts, and if each roundtrip takes a significant amount of time ...
The 190ms seems quite high. On my rather slow workstation, a local connection without SSL takes ~30ms , with SSL ~70ms. So I wouldn't be surprised by ~100ms roundtrips in your case, and that is going to slow down the SSL handshake significantly.
There's very little you can do with the roundtrip time, usually, but you can keep the connections open in a pool. That'll amortize the costs.
regards -- Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
