On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 2:44 AM, Maila Fatticcioni <mfatticcioni@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hello. > I need to tune a postgres installation I've just made to get a better > performance. I use two identical servers with a hot replication > configuration. The two servers have the following hardware: > > Dual Processor Intel Xeon E5-2640V2 20Mb cache 2.00Ghz, > Ram Mem. 32Gb DDR-3 Ecc Registered, > Controller MegaRaid 8-ports 1Gb cache, > 4 Enterprise Hdd NL Sas 600 4Tb Sata, > 2 Samsung SSD 840 Pro Series 512Gb, > 2 Hdd 500 Gb > > I made a software raid with the last two hard disks with ext4 and I > installed Ubuntu 14.04.1 LTS (I have to use this SO) on it. I made a > hardware raid with the four SAS hard disks and I mount the partition > on it with ext4 without journaling and I put the database on it. > > Now I have two more steps to do. > > 1- could you please help tuning the configuration? What are the best > value I should use for wal_buffers and shared_buffers? > 2- I would like to use the two SDD to store the wal file. Do you think > it is useful or how should I use them? > > Thank you for your answers. > > Best Regards, > Maila Fatticcioni > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1 > > iEYEARECAAYFAlSII/gACgkQi2q3wPb3FcPUuACgg2m2o9dQWavLrN2EmmmCpGEv > YnMAoN0R/gejcKwnxf0qFPKXtaGaIG1A > =oLxU > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance We used [1] to great effect when setting our server up. We have not had to diverge much from the recommendations in that document. Generally, the specifics of tuning depend on the workload of your specific instance. [1] https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Tuning_Your_PostgreSQL_Server -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
