On 12/31/2013 09:55 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Josh Berkus <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> Tom, >>> There's an abbreviated version of this argument in the comments in >>> my proposed patch at >>> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/11927.1384199294@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> What I'm hoping will happen next is that the complainants will hot-patch >>> that and see if it fixes their problems. We can't really determine >>> what to do without that information. > >> Unfortunately, the original reporter of this issue will not be available >> for testing for 2-3 weeks, and I haven't been able to devise a synthetic >> test which clearly shows the issue. > > Ping? I've been waiting on committing that patch pending some real-world > testing. It'd be nice to resolve this question before we ship 9.3.3, > which I'm supposing will be sometime in January ... Did this patch every make it in? Or did it hang waiting for verification? -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
