> Yeah, pgTune is pretty badly out of date. It's been on my TODO list, as > I'm sure it has been on Greg's. Yeah. And unfortunately the recommendations it gives have been spreading. Take a look at the online version: http://pgtune.leopard.in.ua/ I entered a pretty typical 92GB system, and it recommended 23GB of shared buffers. I tried to tell the author the performance guidelines have since changed, but it didn't help. ______________________________________________ See http://www.peak6.com/email_disclaimer/ for terms and conditions related to this email -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
