Re: Partitions and work_mem?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Josh Berkus <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 10/14/2014 10:08 AM, Dave Johansen wrote:
> I'm running Postgres 8.4 on RHEL 6 64-bit and I had a question about how
> work_mem and partitions interact.
>
> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Tuning_Your_PostgreSQL_Server#work_mem
> The above wiki states that "if a query involves doing merge sorts of 8
> tables, that requires 8 times work_mem." If I have a table that is
> partitioned does each partition count as a "table" and get its on work_mem?

In theory, this could happen.  In practice, based on tests I did at Sun
with DBT3 and 8.3, no backend ever used more than 3X work_mem.  This is
partly because the level of parallelism in postgres is extremely
limited, so we can't actually sort 8 partitions at the same time.

Thanks for the feedback. That's very helpful.
 
BTW, 8.4 is EOL.  Maybe time to upgrade?

RHEL 6 isn't EOLed and we're working on moving to RHEL 7 but it's a slow process that will probably take quite a bit of time, if it ever happens.

[Postgresql General]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP Users]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux