On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 08/20/2014 07:40 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: >> >>> I am also >>> unclear exactly what you tested, as I didn't see it mentioned in the >>> email --- CPU type, CPU count, and operating system would be the minimal >>> information required. >> >> Ooops! I thought I'd posted that earlier, but I didn't. >> >> The processors in question is the Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7- 4850, with 4 >> of them for a total of 40 cores or 80 HT cores. >> >> OS is RHEL with 2.6.32-431.3.1.el6.x86_64. > > I'm running almost the exact same setup in production as a spare. It > has 4 of those CPUs, 256G RAM, and is currently set to use HT. Since > it's a spare node I might be able to do some testing on it as well. > It's running a 3.2 kernel right now. I could probably get a later > model kernel on it even. > > -- > To understand recursion, one must first understand recursion. To update this last post, the machine I have is running ubuntu 12.04.1 right now, and I have kernels 3.2, 3.5, 3.8, 3.11, and 3.13 available to put on it. We're looking at removing it from our current production cluster so I could likely do all kinds of crazy tests on it. -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
