Re: Why shared_buffers max is 8GB?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Alexey,

On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 1:21 PM, Alexey Vasiliev <leopard_ne@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I read from several sources, what maximum shared_buffers is 8GB.

I believe that was an issue on some older versions, and thats why was
mentioned in several talks. Today it is a sort of apocrypha.

> Does this true? If yes, why exactly this number is maximum number of
> shared_buffers for good performance (on Linux 64-bits)?

25% of available RAM is a good idea to start. Sometimes, if you have
heavy workload _and_ it is possible to reside whole database in
memory, better to use something larger, about  ~75% of RAM.

Best regards,
Ilya
-- 
Ilya Kosmodemiansky,

PostgreSQL-Consulting.com
tel. +14084142500
cell. +4915144336040
ik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance




[Postgresql General]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP Users]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux