On 03/25/2014 08:21 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
I would say that's the one thing that rsync is *not*. pg_basebackup
takes care of a lot of things under the hood. rsync is a lot more
complicated, in particular in failure scenarios, since you have to
manually deal with pg_start/stop_backup().
There are definitely reasons you'd prefer rsync over pg_basebackup, but
I don't believe simplicity is one of them.
//Magnus
Good God man... since when do you top post!
Well there are tools that use rsync to solve those issues :P. We even
have one that does multi-threaded rsync so you can pull many Terabytes
in very little time (relatively).
JD
--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 509-416-6579
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
High Availability, Oracle Conversion, Postgres-XC, @cmdpromptinc
Political Correctness is for cowards.
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
