On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 02/10/2014 09:52 PM, M Putz wrote:Different data type. The first uses numeric, which is pretty slow for doing calculations. random() returns a double, which makes the pow and sum to also use double, which is a lot faster.
Hello,
While analyzing performance, we encountered the following phenomenon,
SELECT sum(pow(.5*generate_series,.5))
FROM generate_series(1,1000000);
is much much (a hundred times) slower than
SELECT sum(pow(random()*generate_series,.5))
FROM generate_series(1,1000000);
and asymptotic difference is even more astounding.
This seems counter-intuitive, considering the cost of
an additional random() call instead of a constant factor.
What are the reasons for this strange performance boost?
To see the effect, try these variants:
SELECT sum(pow(.5::float8 * generate_series,.5))
FROM generate_series(1,1000000);
SELECT sum(pow(random()::numeric * generate_series,.5))
FROM generate_series(1,1000000);
- Heikki
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
That's interesting .. Does PostgreSQL always use the NUMERIC data type for constants in absence of cast ?
Sébastien
