Re: Parallel Select query performance and shared buffers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 11:49 PM, Metin Doslu <metin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Here are some extra information:
>
> - When we increased NUM_BUFFER_PARTITIONS to 1024, this problem is
> disappeared for 8 core machines and come back with 16 core machines on
> Amazon EC2. Would it be related with PostgreSQL locking mechanism?

  I think here there is a good chance of improvement with the patch
suggested by Andres in this thread, but
  still i think it might not completely resolve the current problem as
there will be overhead of associating data
  with shared buffers.

  Currently NUM_BUFFER_PARTITIONS is fixed, so may be auto tuning it
based on some parameter's can
  help such situations.

With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com


-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance




[Postgresql General]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP Users]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux