Re: Efficient Correlated Update

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-performance-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:pgsql-
> performance-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Kevin Grittner
> Sent: Friday, August 09, 2013 11:44 AM
> To: Robert DiFalco; pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re:  Efficient Correlated Update
> 
> Robert DiFalco <robert.difalco@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > In my system a user can have external contacts. When I am bringing in
> > external contacts I want to correlate any other existing users in the
> > system with those external contacts. A users external contacts may or
> > may not be users in my system. I have a user_id field in "contacts"
> > that is NULL if that contact is not a user in my system
> >
> > Currently I do something like this after reading in external
> > contacts:
> >
> >   UPDATE contacts SET user_id = u.id
> >   FROM my_users u
> >   JOIN phone_numbers pn ON u.phone_significant = pn.significant
> >   WHERE contacts.owner_id = 7
> >   AND contacts.user_id IS NULL
> >   AND contacts.id = pn.ref_contact_id;
> >
> > If any of the fields are not self explanatory let me know.
> > "Significant" is just the right 7 most digits of a raw phone number.
> >
> > I'm more interested in possible improvements to my relational logic
> > than the details of the "significant" condition. IOW, I'm start enough
> > to optimize the "significant" query but not smart enough to know if
> > this is the best approach for the overall correlated UPDATE query. :)
> >
> > So yeah, is this the best way to update a contact's user_id reference
> > based on a contacts phone number matching the phone number of a user?
> >
> > One detail from the schema -- A contact can have many phone numbers
> > but a user in my system will only ever have just one phone number.
> > Hence the JOIN to "phone_numbers" versus the column in "my_users".
> 
> In looking it over, nothing jumped out at me as a problem.  Are you having
> some problem with it, like poor performance or getting results different from
> what you expected?
> 
> --
> Kevin Grittner
> EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
> 

There is an illness that sometimes strikes database developers/administrators.
It is called CTD - Compulsive Tuning Disorder :)

Igor Neyman




-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance





[Postgresql General]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP Users]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux