Re: Looks like merge join planning time is too big, 55 seconds

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sergey Burladyan <eshkinkot@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Hot standby:
...
> '          ->  Index Only Scan using items_user_id_idx on public.items  (cost=0.00..24165743.48 rows=200673143 width=8) (actual time=56064.499..56064.499 rows=1 loops=1)'
> '                Output: public.items.user_id'
> '                Index Cond: (public.items.user_id IS NOT NULL)'
> '                Heap Fetches: 8256426'
> '                Buffers: shared hit=3694164 read=6591224 written=121652'
> 'Total runtime: 56064.571 ms'
>
> Master:
>
...
> '          ->  Index Only Scan using items_user_id_idx on public.items  (cost=0.00..24166856.02 rows=200680528 width=8) (actual time=202.756..202.756 rows=1 loops=1)'
> '                Output: public.items.user_id'
> '                Index Cond: (public.items.user_id IS NOT NULL)'
> '                Heap Fetches: 0'
> '                Buffers: shared hit=153577 read=1'
> 'Total runtime: 202.786 ms'

Looks like visibility map is not replicated into slave somehow?

If it matters, Master was restarted yesterday, Standby was not.



-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance




[Postgresql General]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP Users]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux