Re: Setting vacuum_freeze_min_age really low

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 8:50 AM, Andres Freund <andres@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> [ a response that I entirely agree with ]

+1 to all that.

It's maybe worth noting that it's probably fairly uncommon for vacuum
to read a page and not dirty it, because if the page is all-visible,
we won't read it.  And if it's not all-visible, and there's nothing
else interesting to do with it, we'll probably make it all-visible,
which will dirty it.  It can happen, if for example we vacuum a page
with no dead tuples while the inserting transaction is still running,
or committed but not yet all-visible.  Of course, in those cases we
won't be able to freeze, either.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance




[Postgresql General]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP Users]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux