On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 02:01:45PM -0600, Shaun Thomas wrote: > On 11/30/2012 01:57 PM, Ben Chobot wrote: > > >Hm, this sounds like something we should look into. Before we start > >digging do you have more to share, or did you leave it with the "huh, > >that's weird; this seems to fix it" solution? > > We're still testing. We're still on the -31 kernel. We tried the -33 > kernel which *might* fix it, but then this happened: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1084264 > > So now we're testing -34 which is currently proposed. Either way, > it's pretty clear that Ubuntu's choice of patches to backport is > rather eclectic and a little wonky, or that nailing down load > calculations went awry since the NOHZ stuff started, or both. At > this point, I wish we'd stayed on CentOS. Or Debian. Not sure what would justify use of Ubuntu as a server, except wanting to have the exact same OS as their personal computers. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@xxxxxxxxxx> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
