Hi all,
I've created a test table containing 21 million random dates and
times, but I get wildly different results when I introduce a
functional index then ANALYSE again, even though it doesn't use the
index:
postgres=# CREATE TABLE test (id serial, sampledate timestamp);
CREATE TABLE
postgres=# INSERT INTO test (sampledate) SELECT '1970-01-01
00:00:00'::timestamp + (random()*1350561945 || ' seconds')::interval
FROM generate_series(1,21000000);
INSERT 0 21000000
postgres=# VACUUM;
VACUUM
postgres=# EXPLAIN SELECT extract(month FROM sampledate), count(*)
FROM test GROUP BY extract(month FROM sampledate);
QUERY PLAN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
HashAggregate (cost=481014.00..481016.50 rows=200 width=8)
-> Seq Scan on test (cost=0.00..376014.00 rows=21000000 width=8)
(2 rows)
postgres=# ANALYSE;
ANALYZE
postgres=# EXPLAIN SELECT extract(month FROM sampledate), count(*)
FROM test GROUP BY extract(month FROM sampledate);
QUERY PLAN
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
GroupAggregate (cost=4078473.42..4498473.90 rows=21000024 width=8)
-> Sort (cost=4078473.42..4130973.48 rows=21000024 width=8)
Sort Key: (date_part('month'::text, sampledate))
-> Seq Scan on test (cost=0.00..376014.30 rows=21000024 width=8)
(4 rows)
postgres=# CREATE INDEX idx_test_sampledate_month ON test
(extract(month FROM sampledate));
CREATE INDEX
postgres=# EXPLAIN SELECT extract(month FROM sampledate), count(*)
FROM test GROUP BY extract(month FROM sampledate);
QUERY PLAN
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
GroupAggregate (cost=4078470.03..4498470.03 rows=21000000 width=8)
-> Sort (cost=4078470.03..4130970.03 rows=21000000 width=8)
Sort Key: (date_part('month'::text, sampledate))
-> Seq Scan on test (cost=0.00..376014.00 rows=21000000 width=8)
(4 rows)
postgres=# ANALYSE;
ANALYZE
postgres=# EXPLAIN SELECT extract(month FROM sampledate), count(*)
FROM test GROUP BY extract(month FROM sampledate);
QUERY PLAN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
HashAggregate (cost=481012.85..481013.00 rows=12 width=8)
-> Seq Scan on test (cost=0.00..376013.17 rows=20999934 width=8)
(2 rows)
The estimate is down to almost a 10th of what it was before. What's going on?
And as a side note, how come it's impossible to get the planner to use
an index-only scan to satisfy the query (disabling sequential and
regular index scans)?
--
Thom
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
