Re: shared_buffers/effective_cache_size on 96GB server

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On 10 October 2012 19:11, Julien Cigar <jcigar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> shared_buffers = 10GB
>
>
> Generally going over 4GB for shared_buffers doesn't help.. some of the
> overhead of bgwriter and checkpoints is more or less linear in the size of
> shared_buffers ..

Nothing is black or white; It's all shades of Grey :) It depends on
workload. In my case external consultants recommended 8GB and I was
able to increase it up to 10GB. This was mostly read-only workload.
>From my experience large buffer cache acts as handbrake for
write-heavy workloads.

-- 
Ondrej Ivanic
(ondrej.ivanic@xxxxxxxxx)
(http://www.linkedin.com/in/ondrejivanic)


-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance


[Postgresql General]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP Users]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux