On 08/15/12 14:05, Josh Berkus wrote: > >> That actually makes sense to me. Cluster the rows covered by that >> index, let the rest fall where they may. I'm typically only accessing >> the rows covered by that index, so I'd get the benefit of the cluster >> command but wouldn't have to spend cycles doing the cluster for rows I >> don't care about. > > Sure, that's a feature request though. And thinking about it, I'm > willing to bet that it's far harder to implement than it sounds. > > In the meantime, you could ad-hoc this by splitting the table into two > partitions and clustering one of the two partitions. Wouldn't creating a second index on the boolean itself and then clustering on that be much easier? Bosco. -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
