On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 6:23 PM, John Lister <john.lister@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Cheers, I'll give it a go, I wonder if this is likely to be integrated into > the main code? As has been mentioned here before, postgresql isn't as badly > affected as mysql for example, but I'm wondering if the trend to larger > memory and more cores/nodes means it should be offered as an option? > Although saying that I've read that 10Gb of shared buffers may be enough > even in big machines 128+Gb ram.. > > Thoughts? The attached (better) patch builds and doesn't crash at least. Which is always good. Configure with --with-numa
Attachment:
numa.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
