Pavel, are you saying that the code of the stored function is actually being
added to the SQL query, instead of a call to it? For example, I have seen
this:
SELECT myVar
FROM myTable
WHERE myVar > 0 AND myFunc(myVar)
And seen the SQL body of myVar appended to the outer query:
... Filter: SELECT CASE WHERE myVar < 10 THEN true ELSE false END
Is this what we are talking about? Two questions:
1) Is this also done when the function is called as a SELECT column;
e.g. would:
SELECT myFunc(myVar) AS result
- become:
SELECT (
SELECT CASE WHERE myVar < 10 THEN true ELSE false END
) AS result?
2) Does that not bypass the benefits of IMMUTABLE?
-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-performance-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:pgsql-performance-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Pavel Stehule
Sent: January 28, 2012 1:38 AM
To: Carlo Stonebanks
Cc: Merlin Moncure; pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: pl/pgsql functions outperforming sql ones?
2012/1/27 Carlo Stonebanks <stonec.register@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Yes, I did test it - i.e. I ran the functions on their own as I had
always
> noticed a minor difference between EXPLAIN ANALYZE results and direct
query
> calls.
>
> Interesting, so sql functions DON'T cache plans? Will plan-caching be of
any
> benefit to SQL that makes no reference to any tables? The SQL is emulating
> the straight non-set-oriented procedural logic of the original plpgsql.
>
It is not necessary usually - simple SQL functions are merged to outer
query - there are e few cases where this optimization cannot be
processed and then there are performance lost.
For example this optimization is not possible (sometimes) when some
parameter is volatile
Regards
Pavel Stehule
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
