On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I don't think there's anything particular in postgres that would make it a > poor choice on a small system, as far as CPU usage is concerned anyway. But > inserting rows in a database is certainly slower than, say, writing them > into a flat file. How did you install postgres? Did you build it? Which configure flags did you use? Exactly which m68k cpu is it? (it does matter) For instance... wiki: "However, a significant difference is that the 68060 FPU is not pipelined and is therefore up to three times slower than the Pentium in floating point applications" This means, if you don't configure the build correctly, you will get really sub-optimal code. Modern versions are optimized for modern cpus. Of utmost importance, I would imagine, is the binary format chosen for pg data types (floating types especially, if you use them). -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
