Jon Nelson <jnelson+pgsql@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > I've got a 5GB table with about 12 million rows. > Recently, I had to select the distinct values from just one column. > The planner chose an index scan. The query took almost an hour. > When I forced index scan off, the query took 90 seconds (full table scan). Usually, we hear complaints about the opposite. Are you using nondefault cost settings? > The planner estimated 70,000 unique values when, in fact, there are 12 > million (the value for this row is *almost* but not quite unique). > What's more, despite bumping the statistics on that column up to 1000 > and re-analyzing, the planner now thinks that there are 300,000 unique > values. Accurate ndistinct estimates are hard, but that wouldn't have much of anything to do with this particular choice, AFAICS. > How can I tell the planner that a given column is much more unique > than, apparently, it thinks it is? 9.0 and up have ALTER TABLE ... ALTER COLUMN ... SET n_distinct. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance