Tory, A seq scan across 83GB in 4 minutes is pretty good. That's over 300MB/s. Even if you assume that 1/3 of the table was already cached, that's still over 240mb/s. Good disk array. Either you need an index, or you need to not do this query at user request time. Or a LOT more RAM. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
