Re: Using incrond for archiving

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/11/2011 04:21 PM, Shaun Thomas wrote:

So my real question: is this safe?

So to answer my own question: no, it's not safe. The PG backends apparently write to the xlog files periodically and *close* them after doing so. There's no open filehandle that gets written until the file is full and switched to the next one.

Knowing that, I used pg_xlogfile_name(pg_current_xlog_location()) to get the most recent xlog file, and wrote a small script incrond would launch. In the script, it gets the current xlog, and will refuse to copy that one.

What I don't quite understand is that after calling pg_xlog_switch(), it will sometimes still write to an old xlog several minutes later. Here's an example (0069 is the current xlog):

2011-11-14 15:05:01 : 0000000200000ED500000069 : xlog : too current
2011-11-14 15:05:06 : 0000000200000ED500000069 : xlog : too current
2011-11-14 15:05:20 : 0000000200000ED500000069 : xlog : too current
2011-11-14 15:06:01 : 0000000200000ED500000069 : xlog : too current
2011-11-14 15:06:06 : 0000000200000ED500000069 : xlog : too current
2011-11-14 15:06:06 : 0000000200000ED500000069 : xlog : too current
2011-11-14 15:06:37 : 0000000200000ED500000069 : xlog : too current
2011-11-14 15:06:58 : 0000000200000ED500000045 : xlog : copying
2011-11-14 15:07:01 : 0000000200000ED500000069 : xlog : too current
2011-11-14 15:07:06 : 0000000200000ED500000069 : xlog : too current
2011-11-14 15:07:08 : 0000000200000ED500000069 : xlog : too current
2011-11-14 15:07:20 : 0000000200000ED500000064 : xlog : copying
2011-11-14 15:07:24 : 0000000200000ED500000014 : xlog : copying
2011-11-14 15:07:39 : 0000000200000ED500000069 : xlog : too current
2011-11-14 15:07:45 : 0000000200000ED500000061 : xlog : copying
2011-11-14 15:08:01 : 0000000200000ED500000069 : xlog : too current

Why on earth is it sending IN_CLOSE_WRITE messages for 0014, 1145, and 0061? Is that just old threads closing their old filehandles after they realize they can't write to that particular xlog? Either way, adding lsof or (ironically much faster pg_current_xlog_location) checking for the most recent xlog to ignore, I can "emulate" PG archive mode using an asynchronous background process.

On another note, watching kernel file IO messages is quite fascinating.

--
Shaun Thomas
OptionsHouse | 141 W. Jackson Blvd. | Suite 800 | Chicago IL, 60604
312-676-8870
sthomas@xxxxxxxxx

______________________________________________

See http://www.peak6.com/email_disclaimer/ for terms and conditions related to this email

--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance


[Postgresql General]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP Users]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux