Michael Viscuso <michael.viscuso@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Greg/Tom, you are correct, these columns should be modified to whatever > is easiest for Postgres to recognize 64-bit unsigned integers. Would > you still recommend bigint for unsigned integers? I likely read the > wrong documentation that suggested bigint for signed 64-bit integers and > numeric(20) for unsigned 64-bit integers. Unsigned? Oh, hm, that's a bit of a problem because we don't have any unsigned types. If you really need to go to 2^64 and not 2^63 then you're stuck with numeric ... but that last bit is costing ya a lot. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
