Hi, On 12 September 2011 12:28, Stephen Frost <sfrost@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Once those are done, you can query against the 'parent' table with > something like: > select * from parent where date = '2010-01-01'; > > And PG will realize it only has to look at table2 to get the results for > that query. This means the partitioning can be more-or-less any check > constraint that will be satisfied by the data in the table (and PG will > check/enforce this) and that PG can figure out will eliminate a partition > from possibly having the data that matches the request. Theory is nice but there are few gotchas (in 8.4) : - planner can use constant expressions only. You will get scans across all partitions when you use function (like now(), immutable function with constant arguments), sub query (like part_col = (select x from ...) .. ) or anything which can't be evaluated to constat during query planning. - partitions constraints are not "pushed to joins" (assuming tables partitioned by primary key): select ... from X left join Y on X.primary_key = Y.primary_key where part_col >= ... and X.primary_key >= .,, and X.primary_key < ... must be rewritten like select ... from X left join Y on X.primary_key = Y.primary_key and X.primary_key >= .,, and Y.primary_key < ... where X.primary_key >= .,, and X.primary_key < ... in order to avoid scan entire Y table (not only relevant partitions) - ORDER BY / LIMIT X issue fixed in 9.1 (Allow inheritance table scans to return meaningfully-sorted results. Moreover all queries should have 'WHERE' on column which is used for partitioning otherwise partitioning is not very useful (yes, it could simplify data management -- drop partition vs delete from X where part_col between A and B) -- Ondrej Ivanic (ondrej.ivanic@xxxxxxxxx) -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance