Re: Oracle v. Postgres 9.0 query performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello

what is your settings for

random_page_cost, seq_page_cost and work_mem?

Regards

Pavel Stehule

2011/6/8 Tony Capobianco <tcapobianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Here's the explain analyze:
>
> pg_dw=# explain analyze CREATE TABLE ecr_opens with (FILLFACTOR=100)
> as
> select o.emailcampaignid, count(memberid) opencnt
> Âfrom openactivity o,ecr_sents s
> Âwhere s.emailcampaignid = o.emailcampaignid
> Âgroup by o.emailcampaignid;
>
> QUERY
> PLAN
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ÂGroupAggregate Â(cost=0.00..1788988.05 rows=9939 width=12) (actual
> time=308630.967..2592279.526 rows=472 loops=1)
> Â -> ÂNested Loop Â(cost=0.00..1742467.24 rows=9279316 width=12)
> (actual time=31.489..2589363.047 rows=8586466 loops=1)
> Â Â Â Â -> ÂIndex Scan using ecr_sents_ecid_idx on ecr_sents s
> (cost=0.00..38.59 rows=479 width=4) (actual time=0.010..13.326 rows=479
> loops=1)
> Â Â Â Â -> ÂIndex Scan using openact_emcamp_idx on openactivity o
> (cost=0.00..3395.49 rows=19372 width=12) (actual time=1.336..5397.139
> rows=17926 loops=479)
> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Index Cond: (o.emailcampaignid = s.emailcampaignid)
> ÂTotal runtime: 2592284.336 ms
>
>
> On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 17:31 +0200, tv@xxxxxxxx wrote:
>> > On Postgres, this same query takes about 58 minutes (could not run
>> > explain analyze because it is in progress):
>> >
>> > pg_dw=# explain CREATE TABLE ecr_opens with (FILLFACTOR=100)
>> > pg_dw-# as
>> > pg_dw-# select o.emailcampaignid, count(memberid) opencnt
>> > pg_dw-# Â from openactivity o,ecr_sents s
>> > pg_dw-# Âwhere s.emailcampaignid = o.emailcampaignid
>> > pg_dw-# Âgroup by o.emailcampaignid;
>> > Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â ÂQUERY
>> > PLAN
>> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > ÂGroupAggregate Â(cost=0.00..1788988.05 rows=9939 width=12)
>> > Â Â-> ÂNested Loop Â(cost=0.00..1742467.24 rows=9279316 width=12)
>> > Â Â Â Â Â-> ÂIndex Scan using ecr_sents_ecid_idx on ecr_sents s
>> > (cost=0.00..38.59 rows=479 width=4)
>> > Â Â Â Â Â-> ÂIndex Scan using openact_emcamp_idx on openactivity o
>> > (cost=0.00..3395.49 rows=19372 width=12)
>> > Â Â Â Â Â Â Â ÂIndex Cond: (o.emailcampaignid = s.emailcampaignid)
>> > (5 rows)
>> >
>>
>> Please, post EXPLAIN ANALYZE, not just EXPLAIN. Preferably using
>> explain.depesz.com.
>>
>> regards
>> Tomas
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
>

-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance



[Postgresql General]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP Users]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux