Re: reducing random_page_cost from 4 to 2 to force index scan

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello.

As of me, all this "hot" thing really looks like uncertain and dynamic enough. Two things that I could directly use right now (and they are needed in pair) are: 1)Per-table/index/database bufferpools (split shared buffer into parts, allow to specify which index/table/database goes where)
2)Per-table/index cost settings

If I had this, I could allocate specific bufferpools for tables/indexes that MUST be hot in memory and set low costs for this specific tables. P.S. Third thing, great to have to companion this two is "Load on startup" flag to automatically populate bufferpools with fast sequential read, but this can be easily emulated with a statement.

Best regards, Vitalii Tymchyshyn

--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance


[Postgresql General]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP Users]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux