I'm asking them for (real) benchmarks, thanks for the advice. (fio is not available for us now to do it myself, grmbl)
I mean, maybe the index is generally read sequentially and then, when retrieving the data, there is a lot of random I/O.
if it's a long story, any tips for info about this (book or web site)?
cheers,
wbl
--
"Patriotism is the conviction that your country is superior to all others because you were born in it." -- George Bernard Shaw
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:33 AM, Jesper Krogh <jesper@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 2011-05-04 07:25, Willy-Bas Loos wrote:It was more, "given all the incertainties, that seems like the least risky".
are you saying that, generally speaking, moving the data would be better
unless the SAN performs worse than the disks?
The SAN might actually be less well performing than what you currently
have, you dont know yet I guess?DAS way => A disk array where the database has sole access
besides your point that it depends on what our end looks like i mean.
(and what do you mean by "the DAS way", sry no native speaker)
to the hardware (not shared among other systems). Examples
are Dell MD1200/1220 or similary.
--
Jesper
--
"Patriotism is the conviction that your country is superior to all others because you were born in it." -- George Bernard Shaw
