On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Shaun Thomas <sthomas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 04/20/2011 09:01 AM, Laurent Laborde wrote: > >> A review of the V+100 on the excellent anandtech : >> http://www.anandtech.com/show/4010/kingston-ssdnow-v-plus-100-review > > That's horrifying. 4.9MB/s random writes? 19.7MB/s random reads? That's at > least an order of magnitude lower than other SSDs of that generation. I > can't imagine that would be very good for database usage patterns by > comparison. Especially with that aggressive garbage collection. > > I mean... an old Indilinx OCZ Vertex has better performance than that We just orderer 2 Corsair C300 240GB to compare performance and see if the difference is as huge as claimed on anandtech's benchmark :) -- Laurent "ker2x" Laborde Sysadmin & DBA at http://www.over-blog.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
