On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Aside from a bug, that's the only reason I can think for a pg backend > to bail out like that. Well, the connection could have been cut off by > other means (ie: someone tripped on the cable or something), but lets > not dwell on those options. Sorry for the double-post, but I should add, you really should set up some kind of monitoring, like cacti[0] with snmp or a similar setup, so you can monitor the state of your server in detail without having to stare at it. [0] http://www.cacti.net/ -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
