Re: Intel SSDs that may not suck

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2011-03-29 06:13, Merlin Moncure wrote:
My own experience with MLC drives is that write cycle expectations are
more or less as advertised. They do go down (hard), and have to be
monitored. If you are writing a lot of data this can get pretty
expensive although the cost dynamics are getting better and better for
flash. I have no idea what would be precisely prudent, but maybe some
good monitoring tools and phased obsolescence at around 80% duty cycle
might not be a bad starting point.  With hard drives, you can kinda
wait for em to pop and swap em in -- this is NOT a good idea for flash
raid volumes.
What do you mean by "hard", I have some in our setup, but
havent seen anyting "hard" just yet. Based on report on the net
they seem to slow down writes to "next to nothing" when they
get used but that seems to be more gracefully than old
rotating drives..  can you elaborate a bit more?

Jesper

--
Jesper

--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance


[Postgresql General]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP Users]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux