Re: Shouldn't we have a way to avoid "risky" plans?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



24.03.11 20:41, Merlin Moncure написав(ла):
2011/3/24 Віталій Тимчишин<tivv00@xxxxxxxxx>:

This can se GUC-controllable. Like plan_safety=0..1 with low default value.
This can influence costs of plans where cost changes dramatically with small
table changes and/or statistics is uncertain. Also this can be used as
direct "hint" for such dangerous queries by changing GUC for session/single
query.
ISTM if you add statistics miss and 'risk margin' to the things the
planner would have to consider while generating a plan, you are
greatly increasing the number of plan paths that would have to be
considered for any non trivial query.
Why so? I simply change cost estimation functions. This won't change number of pathes.

Best regards, Vitalii Tymchyshyn.

--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance


[Postgresql General]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP Users]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux