On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Vitalii Tymchyshyn <tivv00@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
23.03.11 13:21, Adarsh Sharma ÐÐÐÐÑÐÐ(ÐÐ):Actually the plans are equal, so I suppose it depends on what were run first :). Slow query operates with data mostly on disk, while fast one with data in memory.Thank U all, for U'r Nice Support.
Let me Conclude the results, below results are obtained after finding the needed queries :
First Option :
pdc_uima=# explain analyze select distinct(p.crawled_page_id)
pdc_uima-# from page_content p left join clause2 c on (p.crawled_page_id =
pdc_uima(# c.source_id) where (c.source_id is null);
ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ QUERY PLANÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ÂHashAggregate (cost=100278.16..104104.75 rows=382659 width=8) (actual time=87927.000..87930.084 rows=72 loops=1)
 -> Nested Loop Anti Join (cost=0.00..99320.46 rows=383079 width=8) (actual time=0.191..87926.546 rows=74 loops=1)
 -> Seq Scan on page_content p (cost=0.00..87132.17 rows=428817 width=8) (actual time=0.027..528.978 rows=428467 loops=1)
 -> Index Scan using idx_clause2_source_id on clause2 c (cost=0.00..18.18 rows=781 width=4) (actual time=0.202..0.202 rows=1 loops=428467)
ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ Index Cond: (p.crawled_page_id = c.source_id)
ÂTotal runtime: 87933.882 ms :-(
(6 rows)
Second Option :
pdc_uima=# explain analyze select distinct(p.crawled_page_id) from page_content p
pdc_uima-# where NOT EXISTS (select 1 from clause2 c where c.source_id = p.crawled_page_id);
ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ QUERY PLANÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ÂHashAggregate (cost=100278.16..104104.75 rows=382659 width=8) (actual time=7047.259..7050.261 rows=72 loops=1)
 -> Nested Loop Anti Join (cost=0.00..99320.46 rows=383079 width=8) (actual time=0.039..7046.826 rows=74 loops=1)
 -> Seq Scan on page_content p (cost=0.00..87132.17 rows=428817 width=8) (actual time=0.008..388.976 rows=428467 loops=1)
 -> Index Scan using idx_clause2_source_id on clause2 c (cost=0.00..18.18 rows=781 width=4) (actual time=0.013..0.013 rows=1 loops=428467)
ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ Index Cond: (c.source_id = p.crawled_page_id)
ÂTotal runtime: 7054.074 ms :-)
(6 rows)
yeah. maybe the easiest way, is to start a fresh session and fire the queries.
Â
Â
Best regards, Vitalii Tymchyshyn
--
Regards,
Chetan Suttraway
EnterpriseDB, TheÂEnterprise PostgreSQLÂcompany.
